The Contribution of the Capability Approach to the Understanding of Young People’s Sustainability Engagement as a Positive Developmental Outcome.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/2927Abstract
Young people’s engagement with sustainability includes both civic and pro environmental behaviors (e.g. environmental activism) that contribute to the development of sustainable communities. It reflects a holistic idea of sustainability, where civic democracy and ecological integrity are strictly interconnected. The lack of empirical studies exploring this kind of engagement among young people may well be a consequence of the lack in the literature of a shared theoretical model that provides a framework for both types of behaviors. By integrating Positive Youth Development with the Capability Approach, the aim of this paper is to provide new theoretical input as a way of filling this gap. The proposed model is based on the idea that both positive individual and sustainable development are a question of social justice that takes place within specific domains and is related to understanding experience within life courses.
Key words: Positive Youth Development; Capability Approach; Young people; Engagement; Sustainability
References
Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of Community, Civic Engagement and Social Wellbeing in Italian Adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 387–406. doi: 10.1002/casp.903.
Ballet, J., Koffi, J.M., Pelenc, J. (2013). Environment, justice and the capability approach. Ecological Economics, 85, 28-34. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.010.
Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Bookchin, M., (1985). The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Montreal and New York: Blake Rose Books.
Chawla, L., and Flanders Cushing, D. (2007). “Education for strategic environmental behavior.” Environmental Education Research, 13 (4), 437-452. doi: 10.1080/13504620701581539.
Cohler, B. J. (1982). Personal narrative and life course. In P. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 205–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Dodman, M. (2014) Language, its technology and sustainability. Visions for Sustainability 1, 09-19.
Dodman M. (2016). Knowledge and competence. Key concepts in an educational paradigm for a sustainable society. Visions for Sustainability, 5, 15-27.
Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Gardner, G. T. & Stern, P. C. (2002) Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Gifford, R., Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior. A review. International Journal of Psychology, 1-17. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034.
Holland, B. (2007). Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum’s “Capabilities Approach”. Political Research Quarterly (XX), 1-14. doi: doi:10.1177/1065912907306471.
Lerner, R.M., Lerner, J.V., Almerigi, J.B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., Nuadeau, S., Jelicic, H., Alberts, A., Ma,L., Smith, L.M., Bobek, D.L., Richman-Raphel, D., Simpson, I., DiDenti Christiansen, E., von Eye, A. (2005). Positive Youth Development, Participation in Community Youth Development Programs, and Community Contributions of Fifth-Grade Adolescents: Findings From the First Wave Of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17-71. doi: 10.1177/0272431604272461.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nussbaum, M. (1988). Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution. In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M.C. (2003). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics, 9 (2-3), 33-59. Doi:10.1080/1354570022000077926.
Pancer, S. M., L. Rose-Krasnor, and L. Loiselle. (2002). “Youth Conferences as a Context for Engagement.” New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 47–64.
Riemer, M., Lynes, J., & Hickman, G. (2013). Engaging youth in environmental change. A model for developing and assessing youth-based environmental engagement programmes. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 1-23. Doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.812721.
Rossi, G., Dodman, M. (2015). Understanding Young People’s Engagement with Sustainability. An Ecological Approach. Journal of Academic Perspectives, 4, 1- 12.
Rossi, G., Lenzi, M., Sharkey, J., Vieno, A., Santinello, M. (2016). Factors associated with civic engagement in adolescence: The effects of neighborhood, school, family and peer contexts. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(8), 1040-1058. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.21826.
Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: North-Holland.
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sherrod, L.R., Busch, N., & Fischer, C. (2004). Applying developmental science: Methods, visions, and values. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 747-780). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Shinn, M. (2015). Community Psychology and the Capabilities Approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55, 243-252. Doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9713-3.
Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education – Re-Visioning Learning and Change, Schumacher Society Briefing no. 6, Green Books, Dartington.
Tidball, K. G., & Krasny, M.E. (2010). Urban Environmental Education From a Social-Ecological Perspective: Conceptual Framework for Civic Ecology Education. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), 1-20.
