How to write an original article - or an experimental thesis - in the scientific research field
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work is intended as a summary document for all professionals or students who are dealing with the field of scientific research for the first time. The article analyzes the predominant format in the scientific research field: Introduction-Methods-Results-and-Discussion (IMRaD) structure. Furthermore, the sections that also characterize the nowadays research format are also analyzed, such as the title of the research, its summary and the correct citation format. Finally, for students who apply the IMRaD structure to an experimental thesis, the scheme with which this adapts to it.
Downloads
Article Details
The authors agree to transfer the right of their publication to the Journal, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating intellectual authorship and the first publication in this magazine.
References
[2] Gemayel R. How to write a scientific paper. FEBS J. 2016;283(21):3882-3885.
[3] Liumbruno GM, Velati C, Pasqualetti P, Franchini M. How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. Blood Transfus. 2013;11(2):217-26
[4] Alexandrov AV. How to write a research paper. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(2):135-8.
[5] Cuschieri S, Grech V, Savona-Ventura C. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): How to write a scientific thesis. Early Hum Dev. 2018;127:101-105
[6] Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRAD format. AMWA Journal. 1989;4(2):16–18.
[7] Reporting guidelines for main study types. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/, consul-tato il 24 ottobre 2020.
[8] Euser AM, Zoccali C, Jager KJ, Dekker FW. Cohort Studies: Prospective versus Retrospective. Nephron ClinPract. 2009;113(3):214-217.
[9] García-Berthou E, Alcaraz C. Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4(13):1-5.
[10] GünelKaradeniz P, Uzabacı E, AtışKuyukS, et al. Statistical errors in articles published in radiology journals. DiagnIntervRadiol. 2019 ;25(2):102-108.
[11] Franzblau LE, Chung KC. Graphs, tables, and figures in scientific publications: the good, the bad, and how not to be the latter. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(3):591-596.
[12] Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, et al. From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(6):750-756.
[13] TM Annesley. Show Your Cards: The Results Section and the Poker Game. Clin Chem. 2010 Jul;56(7):1066-1070
[14] Cohen HW. P values: use and misuse in medical literature. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(1):18-23.