Dubitanter unum quicque dicemus (inv. 2, 10). The shadow of Philo of Larissa in Cicero's De inventione
Abstract
The contribution examines the presence of Philo of Larissa in Cicero’s De inventione. By developing a comparison between inv. 1, 8 and inv. 2, 9-10, the article aims to demonstrate how the critique of Hermagoras of Temnos with which the first book of the treatise opens does not contradict the probabilistic (and Philonian) inspiration of the second preface. The hypothesis, in particular, is that the strong stance against the introduction of θέσεις into rhetorical doctrine by Hermagoras of Temnos conceals an interest in a topic on which Cicero was deeply reflecting, probably under the innovative influence of Philo of Larissa’s teachings. Philo may have been responsible for the same anti-Hermagorean polemic, and I believe that De inventione shares part of his philosophical outlook, though not yet his rhetorical theory.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.