Antinomia e meontologia dell’inizio

Un confronto col pensiero dell’ultimo Pareyson e di Cacciari

Abstract

Facing “the Beginning–Problem” in Metaphysics leads to aporetical outcomes. I aim to show how in this field the Aristotelian principle of non–contradiction fails: the language which attempts to talk about “the Beginning–Problem” cannot avoid to accept truth as a way of paradox. However it seems to be something deeper than a shortcoming of language. My claim in this paper is that “the Beginning” is structured as a paradox in its own metaphysical outlines.