How U.S. Presidents Are Regarded Historically
The Contrast Between Historians’ Rankings and the Retrospective Public Opinion Approval Ratings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/1592-4467/8680Keywords:
presidential scholars, American presidents, rankingAbstract
In April 2013, when covering the opening of his presidential library in Dallas, part of the media attention was drawn by the “unexpected” surge in approval ratings of former President George W. Bush. That surprise came because the 43rd President was very unpopular when he left office in 2009 and because he is still considered by many scholars as one as the “worst Presidents in history”. Although scholars’ judgment and public opinion surveys often seem not to match each other, this paper explains that George W. Bush’s rise is exactly what one would expect, based on the history of other former presidents’ approval ratings. Indeed, retrospective approval ratings typically exceed approval ratings while in office.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
RSAJournal applies a CC BY-NC-ND license to all its contributions. This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC-ND includes the following elements:
- BY: credit must be given to the creator.
- NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
- ND: No derivatives or adaptations of the work are permitted.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights for their submissions to the journal.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share unedited work for non-commercial purposes with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
