Between Anthropological Invariants and Historical Anthropology: the Question of Becoming-human in Peter Sloterdijk

Auteurs

  • Antonio Lucci Université de Turin

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/10877

Résumé

This contribution aims to provide a selective analysis of Peter Sloterdijk’s philosophical production, specifically focusing on the anthropological problem. Contrary to common perception, Sloterdijk will be presented as an author who only partially belongs to the German philosophical anthropological tradition of the 20th century, encompassing figures like Max Scheler, Helmuth Plessner, and Arnold Gehlen. To support this thesis, the text first outlines the general differentials between two major German-language anthropological traditions: philosophical and historical anthropology. Subsequently, it reconstructs three overarching themes in Sloterdijk’s anthropological investigation: religious anthropology, the problem of hominization, and anthropogenesis. Finally, the positioning of Sloterdijk in relation to two traditions mentioned above will be explored, leading to an evaluation of the significance of Sloterdijk’s anthropological endeavor for a philosophical diagnosis of the contemporary era.

Biographie de l'auteur

Antonio Lucci, Université de Turin

Researcher at the University of Turin, he has been Gastprofessor at the Humboldt Universität in Berlin, and has lectured and researched at the FIPH in Hannover, the IFK in Vienna, the NABA in Milan, the University of Trieste and the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2024-03-15

Comment citer

Lucci, A. (2024). Between Anthropological Invariants and Historical Anthropology: the Question of Becoming-human in Peter Sloterdijk. Philosophy Kitchen - Revue De Philosophie Contemporaine, (20), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/10877

Numéro

Rubrique

dix - PETER SLOTERDIJK