Magnetic Resonance Imaging of fetal brain: study technique and correlation between gestional age and the exam duration

Main Article Content

Marco Bonomi
Chantal Emanuela Noé

Abstract

Introduction

In the fetal area, MRI was first described in 1980 for the study of placenta, but it was assumed that this method could be used for the study of the fetal brain only in the 90s. The main obstacles were both long acquisition times and fetal movements, which created too many artifacts. But it was not until the implementation of ultra-fast Single Shot T2 sequences, that it started to be electively used in clinical practice.

Objective

Check if there is a relationship between the total study time of an MRI fetal brain examination and the patient's gestational age in order to optimize exam planning, to reduce acquisition times and to increase safety for both the mother and the fetus. The FMR is a free radiations technique used to study the fetus and, starting from 19-20 weeks of gestation, it allows for important information about anatomy and fetal development; nowadays, it must be considered as a III level exam that requires a proper, targeted clinical question, and that has to be performed after a II level ultrasound.

Material and methods

This retrospective study was conducted at the Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology Unit of the “Vittore Buzzi” Children’s Hospital in Milan.

The examination times of 484 fetal brain MRI, performed between January 2015 and December 2017, were collected and analyzed through the statistical functions of the RIS & PACS system. The information related to the patients’ gestational age was collected from the medical reports of each exam.

Results

The data analysis shows that, out of 484 MR, 30,37% was performed in patients at 21 weeks of gestation, 8,68% at 20 weeks and 8,26% at 22 weeks; patients at 19 weeks and at 35 weeks were less than 1%. From 31 weeks of gestation onwards, the use of this method has greatly decreased, considering that the execution of the MRI is no longer appropriate for prognosis; moreover, MRI performed at this gestational age usually gives the same diagnostic information as an ultrasound examination.

For every MRI exam, we collected and analyzed the data:


  • Total study time, divided by gestational age. The analysis shows how the duration of the exam reduces as gestational weeks progress.
  • “Dead time” that occurs between the different sequences acquired during the exam. From the data analysis it’s clear that it tends to decrease with the gestational age progression. This is because greater movements are present in smaller fetuses; these movements require greater technical ability and more experience in the setting of the scanning sequence plans.
  • “Live time”, corrisponding to the transmission time of radiofrequencies to the fetus. This data has an intrinsic calculated error because it is an approximate time and it varies in accordance to the size of the fetal brain. A larger fetus will lead to an increase live time because of the greater number of acquisition “slices”.
  • Total number of acquired sequences: the data shows an almost non-existent correlation between gestational age and number of sequences. However, it is worth considering the limit of this analysis because non-diagnostic sequences -as they present too many artifacts- are often not stored in the PACS system.

Conclusion

From the results obtained, we can conclude that the examination times for the study of the fetal brain tend to decrease with the gestational age progression. However, it would be useful to analyze other variables, not taken into consideration in this study, in order to obtain more reliable results. These variables emerged during the data analysis and include the clinical question and the Radiographer’s experience and competence. In this way the hypothesis that the exam acquisition times decrease with an increase of the Radiographer’s experience and practice, could be tested; this would apply especially to 19-22 weeks of gestation women and represents the biggest challenge for the exam management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bonomi, M., & Noé, C. E. (2019). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of fetal brain: study technique and correlation between gestional age and the exam duration. Journal of Biomedical Practitioners, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.13135/2532-7925/4099
Section
Articles

References

[1] Techniques, terminology, and indications for MRI in pregnancy, in “Seminars in Perinatology”; Bahado-Singh R.O, MD, Goncalves L.F,vol 37, 2013, pp. 334-339;
[2] Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks - C. Parazzini & A. Righini & M. Rustico & D. Consonni & F. Triulzi, Neuroradiology, 2008 Oct; (10): 877-83
[3] Standard di Sicurezza in Risonanza Magnetica: Il Regolamento di Sicurezza; M. Giannelli & M. Mascalchi & M. Mattozzi & F. Campanella, Inail, versione aggiornata 2013
[4] Indicazioni operative dell’Inail per la gestione della sicurezza e della qualità in Risonanza Magnetica
[5] Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning ; Iop Publishing - Physics In Medicine And Biology - Phys. Med. Biol. 2008 Nov 7; 53(21): L 15-8; P. A. Gowland and J. De Wilde
[6] IEC 2008 Medical electrical equipment—part 2-33: particular requirements for the safety of magnetic reso-nance equipment for medical diagnosi
[7] Safety of Mr imaging at 1.5 T in Fetuses: A Retrospective CaseControl Study of Birth Weights and the Effects of Acoustic Noise; B. Strizek et al; Radiology 2015 May; 275 (2): 530-7
[8] Comparison Between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI for Fetal Imaging: Is There an Advantage to Imaging With a High-er Field Strength? Teresa Victoria Ann M. Johnson et al.- American Journal of Roentgenology 2016 Jan; 206(1): 195–201
[9] Does 3 T fetal MRI improve image resolution of normal brain structure between 20and 24 week’s gestational age, Priego G. et al, American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2017, 38(8) 1636-1642
[10] Dielectric effect artifact, Dr Matt A. Morgan et al, Radiopaedia
[11] An ideal dielectric coat to avoid prosthesis RF- artefact in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, U. Zanovello et al, Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23; 7(1): 326.
[12] Elementi di risonanza magnetica: dal protone alle sequenze per le principali applicazioni diagnostiche; Co-riasco, Mario, Rampado, Osvaldo, Bradac, Gianni Boris (Eds.) – Springer, 2014
[13] Manuale di RM per TSRM; Vanzulli, Torricelli, Cova, Cobelli, Colagrande, AAVV – Poletto Editore, 2013.