Exploratory Research for the Identification of a Decision-Making Model for the Adoption and Implementation of Emerging Technology in Healthcare Operations
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The most promising medical innovations appear to take a long time to be used in healthcare practice. This research has two main objectives: to understand the factors that limit or promote the adoption of Emerging Technologies (ET) in healthcare and to provide a model for understanding, codifying and improving the current situation.
METHODOLOGY
A case study is used to shed light on the process of adopting ET in healthcare between a teaching hospital (adopter) and a manufacturer of innovation (producer). The primary data, investigated through thematic analysis and literary evidence, consists of nine semi-structured interviews from ET experts on the side of the adopter and the producer.
The Attitude, Decision, and Implementation (ADI) decision-making model is used as the theoretical lens for this study. This framework is a modification of the process described in the theory of Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) (Rogers, 2003) adapted to the peculiarities of the healthcare environment.
RESULTS
From the analysis of the interviews, it is clear that innovation in medicine has several limitations (financial resources, free time of healthcare professionals, correct identification and know-how of the professionals involved, communication, healthcare resistance) against few facilitators (Innovation Champions, appropriate marketing, medical conferences). This study also highlights the absence of a shared and codified model for the adoption of innovation in medicine.
DISCUSSION
The impediments and the facilitating factors that emerged in the analysis of the primary data have been confirmed in literature. Furthermore, the primary data analysis with literary evidence supports the ADI model as a possible decision-making process for the adoption of ET in healthcare. Its three cyclical phases: the creation of an attitude (A) towards the ET, the decision to continue the collaboration between the parties (D), and the implementation of innovation (I) are sustained by primary data and literary evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
The ADI model could improve the efficiency and pace of adoption of ET in healthcare by limiting barriers, exploiting facilitating factors and building a beneficial relationship between users and producers of ET.
Downloads
Dettagli dell'articolo
Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
Riferimenti bibliografici
[2] Herzlinger RE. Why innovation in health care is so hard. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(5):58.
[3] Hendy, J., & Barlow J. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(3):348-355.
[4] Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovation -- Fifth edition. New York: The Free Press; 2003.
[5] Cain M, Mittman R. Diffusion of Innovation in Health Care. Ihealthreports. 2002;(May):29.
[6] Faulkner A, Kent J. Innovation and regulation in human implant technologies: developing comparative approaches. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(7):895–913.
[7] Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians [Internet]. practices’, The New England Journal of Medicine. Avail-able at; 1993. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199310213291714
[8] Dixon-Woods M, Amalberti R, Goodman S, Bergman B, Glasziou P. Problems and promises of innovation: Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(SUPPL. 1):47–51.
[9] Day GS, Schoemaker PJH. Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies. Calif Manag Rev (. 2000;2:8–33.
[10] Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin BR. What is an emerging technology? Res Policy [Internet]. 2015;44(10):1827–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
[11] Länsisalmi H, Kivimäki M, Aalto P, Ruoranen R. Innovation in healthcare: A systematic review of recent research. Nurs Sci Q. 2006;19(1):66–72.
[12] Huston CJ. Professional Issues in Nursing. Challenges Oppor. 2010;2.
[13] Chan ZCY. A systematic review of creative thinking/creativity in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;33(11):1382–7.
[14] Berg AO, Atkins D, Tierney W. Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12.
[15] Rizan C, others. General surgeon’s antibiotic stewardship: climbing the Rogers diffusion of innovation curve-prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;40:78–82.
[16] Berwick DM. Disseminating Innovations in Health Care. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289(15):1969–75.
[17] Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry. 1957;20(4):253–70.
[18] Wei Y, others. Physicians’ perception toward non-invasive prenatal testing through the eye of the Rogers’ diffu-sion of innovation theory in China. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(3):239–44.
[19] Woodside AG, Biemans WG. Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes. J Bus Ind Mark. 2005;20(7):380–93.
[20] Pashaeypoor S, Ashktorab T, Rassouli M, Alavi-Majd H. Predicting the adoption of evidence-based practice using ``Rogers diffusion of innovation model’’. Contemporary nurse. 2016;52(1):85–94.
[21] Abelson J. Understanding the role of contextual influences on local health-care decision making: Case study re-sults from Ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(6):777–93.
[22] Kriz A, Molloy C, Denness B. The global importance of innovation champions: Insights from China. 2013;268–89.
[23] Ham C. Reforming the NHS from within. Beyond hierarchy, inspection and markets. London: Kings Fund; 2014.
[24] Moore G. Crossing the Chasm (New York. NY HarperCollin. 1991;
[25] Oderanti, F. O., Li, F., Cubric, M., & Shi X. Business models for sustainable commercialisation of digital healthcare (eHealth) innovations for an increasingly ageing population. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;171.
[26] Patel, N. R., Patlas, M. N., & Mafeld S. Embolization for Osteoarthritic Pain: Ready to Cross the Chasm? Can As-soc Radiol J. 2021;72(3):334–6.
[27] Krakower DS, KH. M. The role of healthcare providers in the roll out of preexposure prophylaxis. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016 Jan;11(1):41-8. PMID: 2641.
[28] Lundblad J. A Review and Critique of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory as It Applies to Organizations. Or-gan Dev J. 2003;21(4):50.
[29] Damanpour F, Schneider M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment. Organ top Manag. 2006;17(3):215–36.
[30] Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48(1):117–34.
[31] de Ven A, Polley D, Garud R, Venkataram S. The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
[32] Morris T, Wood S. Testing the survey method: continuity and change in British industrial relations. Work Employ Soc. 1991;5(2):259–82.
[33] Neuman WL. Social Research Methods (6th edn). London: Pearson; 2005.
[34] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
[35] Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E. Introduction to Applied Thematic Analysis. Appl Themat Anal. 2014;3–20.
[36] Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research methods for business students. Pearson education; 2009.
[37] Robertson R, Wenzel L, Thompson J, Charles A. Understanding NHS financial pressures: How are they affecting patient care? King’s Fund [Internet]. 2017;(March):1–126. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/Understanding NHS financial pressures - full re-port.pdf%0Ahttps://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/Understanding NHS finan-cial pressures - full r
[38] Cassel JB, others. Palliative care leadership centers are key to the diffusion of palliative care innovation. Health Aff. 2018;37(2):231–9.
[39] Hilz L, N. MRNBS. The Informatics Nurse Specialist as Change Agent: Application of Innovation-Diffusion Theory. Comput Nurs [Internet]. 2000;6:272–81. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=ovftd&NEWS=N&AN=00002771-200011000-00013
[40] Rye CB, Kimberly JR. Review: The adoption of innovations by provider organizations in health care. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(3):235–78.
[41] Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):593–624.
[42] Chlodnicki M, Leszczyński G, Zieliński M. Trade fairs -- a tool for the spread of innovation. In: Proceedings of International Conference for Entrepreneurship. Innovation and Regional Development; 2010.
[43] Fund TK. NHS workforce: our position [Internet]. Available at; 2019. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/positions/nhs-workforce
[44] Katz E, Levin M, Hamilton H. Traditions of Research on the Diffusion of Innovation Author ( s ): Elihu Katz , Mar-tin L . Levin and Herbert Hamilton Published by : {A}merican Sociological Association Stable URL : REFERENCES Linked references are avail. Am Sociol Rev [Internet]. 1963;28(2):237–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090611
[45] Hospital CU. Intellectual property (IP) management. Unpublished: Cambridge University Hospital; 2015.
[46] Plsek P. Complexity and the Adoption of Innovation in Health Care Complexity and the Adoption of Innovation in Health Care. Accel Qual Improv Heal Care Strateg to Speed Diffus Evidence-Based Innov pp. 2003;1–18.
[47] Jelinek M, Schoonhoven CB. The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms. Jossey-Bass Publish-ers; 1990.
[48] Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report. 2003;8(4):597–607.
[49] Woodside AG. Case study research: Theory, methods and practice. Emerald Group Publishing; 2010.