Political Clientelism, Political Culture and Development in Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/3610Keywords:
Political Clientelism, Liberal Democracy, Neo-Colonialism, DevelopmentAbstract
Culture, society and development are the three most pertinent factors associated with every human civilization; however, they are distinctive and relative. Thus, development exists distinctively in every society. Today, globalization has promoted and consolidated democracy – ‘liberal democracy’ – almost across the globe as the single ideology and the best form of government that must be practised for the protection of individuals’ fundamental human rights. However, the adoption of liberal democracy varies and continues to create a dichotomous marginality between the ‘capitalist West’ and the so-called developing nations with respect to its results. The pertinent questions are: what is the relevance of liberal democracy to Third World development? How important are the desirability, feasibility, conditions and possibilities of liberal democracy for a country where democracy is alien to its political culture? And how is the cultural and historical backdrop of the developing world different from that of the West? We will explore the importance of political clientelism in African political development and look beyond liberal democracy for an African-like democracy. This essay aims to contribute to our collaborative intellectual efforts by looking at the existence of development in human cultural patterns, the historical perspective of liberal democracy, its meaning, its validity, its relationship to African development, neo-colonialism and the global clientelistic structure for continuous dependency, as well as political clientelism importance to African development; by reconstructing the ontological notion of development to the Third World nations as envelopment- overt control of the progress of Third World nations by Global West and by suggesting a possible alternative for a sustainable development.Downloads
References
Adediran, Tade. 1996. Democracy and the Rule of Law: History, Concepts and contending ideas in Nigeria.” In: Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by A. Ajomo et al., 47. Lagos; Obafemi Awolowo Foundation.
Alemazung, Joy. 2010. “Post-Colonial Colonialism: An Analysis of International Factors and Actors Marring African Socio-Economic and Political Development.” The Journal of Pan African Studies 3/10: 62-82.
Ahluwalia Pal. 2001. Politics and Post-colonial Theory: African Reflections.London; Routledge: 26.
Auyero, Javier. 1999. “‘From the Client’s Point(s) of View:’ How Poor People Perceive and Evaluate Political Clientelism.” Theory and Society 28/2: 297- 334.
Barrows, Walter. 1971. “Rural-Urban Alliances and Reciprocity in Africa.” Canadian Journal of African Studies 5/3: 307-325.
Beetham, David. 1992. “Liberal Democracy and Limits of Democractization.” Political Studies 40/1: 40-53.
Bratton, Michael and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic experiment in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Wendy. 2003. Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. Theory and Event 7/1: 15-18.
Bruce, Berman 1974. “Clientelism and neocolonialism: Center-periphery relations and political development in African states.” Studies in Comparative International Development Summer 9/2: 3-25.
Clapham, Christopher. 1985. Third World Politics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Falaiye, Muyiwa. 1998. “African Democracy: its problems.” In: Philosophy and Politics, edited by Maduabuchi Dukur, 173- 185. Lagos: Obaroh and Ogbinaka Publishing.
Fayemi Ademola Kazeem. 2009. “Towards an African Theory of Democracy: Thought and Practice.” A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 1/1: 101-126.
Foweraker, Joe and Roman Krznaric. 2000. “Measuring Liberal Democratic Performance: an Empirical and Conceptual Critique.” Department of Government, University of Essex Studies 48/1: 759-787.
Galtung, Johan. 1971. “A structural theory of imperialism.” Journal of Peace Research/2: 81–117.
Garcia-Guadilla, Maria Pilar and Carlos Perez. 2002. “Democracy, decentralization and clientelism.” Latin American Perspectives 29/5: 90-109.
Gerstle, Gary. 2004. “Dangers to Democracy in an Era of Globalization and American Hegemony: A Historical Perspective.” Sapporo Japan: Paper Presented to “Liberal Democracy in a Global/Imperial Age” Conference.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1966. La questione meridionale. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
Janda, Kenneth and Berry Goldman. 1995. The Challenge of Democracy: Government in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Joseph, Robert. 1991. Democracy and Prebendal politics in Nigeria: the rise and fall of the second republic. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Keefer, Philip. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51/4: 804- 821.
Lewis, Arthur. 1965. Politics in West Africa. London: Allen and Unwin.
Lindberg, Staffan. 2004. The Power of Elections. Lund: Intellecta Docusys.
Roniger, Luis. 2004, Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy, [WHAT IS THE JOURNAL TITLE?]36/3: 353-375.
Mwaura, Ndirangu. 2005. Kenya today: Breaking the yoke of colonialism in Africa. New York: Algora Publishing.
Mahler, Greg. 1995. Comparative politics. Newark, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
Madubuike, Solomon.Chukwudi. 2000. “Beyond the new democracy in Africa.” A Review of Culture and Society 2/1, 2: 134-141.
Michels, Robert. 1911. Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens (English translation by Maurice Eden Paul and Cedar Paul. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst’s International Library: 1915, from the Italian edition Sociologia del partito politico nella democrazia moderna: studi sulle tendenze oligarchiche degli aggregati politici, translated by Alfredo Polledro, revised and expanded by the author. Torino: UTET: 1912).
Nkrumah, Kwame 1975. “Redefinition of Neo-Colonialism.” In: Readings in African Political Thought, edited by Gideon-Cyrus M. Mutiso and S. W. Rohio: 415: 418. London: Heinemann.
Odetoyinbo, Deji. 1994. “Why Is Africa Married to the IMF?” d-hwp.com/archives/30/031.html. Accessed on 2nd Aug., 2016.
Ogunsanwo, Alaba. 1994. “Democratisation in Africa.” In: Democratisation in Africa: African Perspectives, edited by Omoruyi Omo, Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Sambo Adeshina and Ada Okwuosa, 138-145. Benin: Hima and Hima.
Omobowale Ayokunle Olumuyiwa and Olutayo Akinpelu Olanrewaju. 2007. “Chief Lamidi Adedibu and patronage politics in Nigeria.” Journal of Modern African Studies 45/3: 1-20.
Omobowale Ayokunle Olumuyiwa. 2008. “Clientelism and social structure: an analysis of patronage in Yoruba social thought.” Afrika Spectrum 43/2: 203-24.
Owolabi, Kolawole. 1999. The Quest for Democracy in Africa: A Theoretical Explanation. Lagos: O. O. P. publishing Ltd.
Oyekan, Adeolu Oluwaseyi. 2009. “Democracy and Africa’s Search for Development.” The Journal of Pan African Studies 3/1: 214-226.
Samet, Dov and David Schmeidler. 2002. “Between liberalism and democracy.” Journal of Economic Theory 110: 213-233.
Sankatsing, Glenn. 1989. Caribbean social science: An assessment. Caracas: Unesco.
Sankatsing, Glenn. 2004. “People’s vote compatible with people’s fate: a democratic alternative to liberal democracy.” Caribbean Reality Studies Center, www.crscenter.com. Accessed on 30th Aug., 2016.
Taylor, Lucy. 2004. Clientship and citizenship in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research 23/2: 213-22.
Sousa, Luis. 2008. “Clientelism and the Quality(ies) of Democracy: Public and Policy Aspects. Perspectives on European Politics.” Disc Working Paper Series. Disc WP/2008/2. Budapest: Center for the Study of Imperfection in Democracy, Central European University.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1994. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Stokes, Susan. 2008. Political Clientelism. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Gli autori che pubblicano su Kervan accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.