Processes of Dis–location and Re–location of Knowledge and Power

Authors

  • Elena Bougleux Università di Bergamo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/1394

Keywords:

dislocation, knowledge, power,

Abstract

Historical analysis of domination patterns identifies phases of ongoing dialectics between rich and poor world areas, claiming instances of self-determination and empowerment in international programs of cooperation. At the same time, new major imbalances in relations of power emerge between new global players, who appear to be committed in a competition towards the Western model of development, mainly characterized by the control over technologies and knowledge/. /Such practices of emulation provide examples of complicity with the hegemonic rhetoric, and help strengthen pairs of opposites (emerging/advanced, technological/intuitive, hegemonic/subaltern) increasingly polarized and less dialectical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Elena Bougleux, Università di Bergamo

Elena Bougleux is professor of Cultural Anthropology and Anthropology of Science at the University of Bergamo. She is currently Visiting Professor at the MPI for the History of Science Berlin. Her interests focus on the processes of knowledge construction in an anthropological, historical and gendered perspective. She has published Costruzioni dello Spaziotempo (2006), Soggetti egemoni e saperi subalterni (2012), and over forty reviewed papers on national and international journals.

References

Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. Modernità in polvere. Roma: Meltemi.

Arnold, David. 2000. Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Borghi, Liana and Clotide Barbarulli, eds. 2004. Figure della Complessità. Genere e intercultura. Cagliari: Cuec.

Bougleux, Elena. 2012a. Soggetti egemoni e saperi subalterni. Firenze: Nardini.

Bougleux, Elena. 2012b. “Exploring Knowledge Flows in a Multinational Corporation.” World Futures, 68:188-196.

Bougleux, Elena. 2014. “Corporations, tecnoscienze e sviluppo locale: dialogo o Conflitto”. DADA Rivista di Antropologia post-globale, 1, 06/2014: 91-118.

Bougleux, Elena. 2015. “Economy, Knowledge, Families: Practices of Appropriation”. Human Affairs, 25, 1/2015: 3-15.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Le strutture sociali dell’economia. Trieste: Asterios.

Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Nuovi soggetti nomadi. Transizioni e identità postnazionaliste. Bologna: Sossella.

Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.

Cartwright, Nancy. 2003. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2004. Provincializzare l’Europa. Roma: Meltemi.

Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. “A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies”. Qualitative Research Methods, v. 43, London: Sage.

Das, Veena. 2000. Critical events: an Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fischer, Michael J. 2007. “Four Genealogies for a Recombinant Anthropology of Science and Technology”. Cultural Anthropology, 22: 539-615.

Fischer, Michael J. 2009. Anthropological Futures, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1967. Le parole e le cose: un’archeologia delle scienze umane. Milano: Rizzoli.

Foucault, Michel. 1980, L’archeologia del sapere, Milano: Rizzoli.

Guha, Ranajit. 1998. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson, 1997, Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology, Durham: Duke University Press.

Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from Below. Postcolonialities and Modernities. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

ICI Berlin. 2014. “Rosi Braidotti: Thinking as a Nomadic Subject” Video, 47:39. Oct 7, 19:30. https://www.ici-berlin.org/event/620/

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lakoff, George. 2010. “Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment”. Environmental Communication, 4 (1): 70-81.

Nader, Laura. 1996. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. London: Routledge.

Polanyi, Karl. 1974. La grande trasformazione. Torino: Einaudi.

Prakash, Gyan. 1992. “Science ‘Gone Native’ in Colonial India”. Representations, 40: 153-178.

Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason. Science and Imagination in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Raina, Dhruv. 1996. “Reconfiguring the Centre. On the Structure of Scientific Exchanges in Colonial India.” Minerva, 34: 161-176.

Raina, Dhruv. 2004. Domesticating Modern Science. New Delhi: Tulika.

Stiglitz, Joseph. E. 2000. Making Globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Stiglitz, Joseph. 2009. La globalizzazione e i suoi oppositori. Torino: Einaudi.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-27

Issue

Section

Terzo momento – Etnografie / Stage Three – Ethnographies