Processes of Dis–location and Re–location of Knowledge and Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/1394Keywords:
dislocation, knowledge, power,Abstract
Historical analysis of domination patterns identifies phases of ongoing dialectics between rich and poor world areas, claiming instances of self-determination and empowerment in international programs of cooperation. At the same time, new major imbalances in relations of power emerge between new global players, who appear to be committed in a competition towards the Western model of development, mainly characterized by the control over technologies and knowledge/. /Such practices of emulation provide examples of complicity with the hegemonic rhetoric, and help strengthen pairs of opposites (emerging/advanced, technological/intuitive, hegemonic/subaltern) increasingly polarized and less dialectical.
Downloads
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. Modernità in polvere. Roma: Meltemi.
Arnold, David. 2000. Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borghi, Liana and Clotide Barbarulli, eds. 2004. Figure della Complessità. Genere e intercultura. Cagliari: Cuec.
Bougleux, Elena. 2012a. Soggetti egemoni e saperi subalterni. Firenze: Nardini.
Bougleux, Elena. 2012b. “Exploring Knowledge Flows in a Multinational Corporation.” World Futures, 68:188-196.
Bougleux, Elena. 2014. “Corporations, tecnoscienze e sviluppo locale: dialogo o Conflitto”. DADA Rivista di Antropologia post-globale, 1, 06/2014: 91-118.
Bougleux, Elena. 2015. “Economy, Knowledge, Families: Practices of Appropriation”. Human Affairs, 25, 1/2015: 3-15.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Le strutture sociali dell’economia. Trieste: Asterios.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Nuovi soggetti nomadi. Transizioni e identità postnazionaliste. Bologna: Sossella.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
Cartwright, Nancy. 2003. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2004. Provincializzare l’Europa. Roma: Meltemi.
Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. “A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies”. Qualitative Research Methods, v. 43, London: Sage.
Das, Veena. 2000. Critical events: an Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Michael J. 2007. “Four Genealogies for a Recombinant Anthropology of Science and Technology”. Cultural Anthropology, 22: 539-615.
Fischer, Michael J. 2009. Anthropological Futures, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1967. Le parole e le cose: un’archeologia delle scienze umane. Milano: Rizzoli.
Foucault, Michel. 1980, L’archeologia del sapere, Milano: Rizzoli.
Guha, Ranajit. 1998. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson, 1997, Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology, Durham: Duke University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from Below. Postcolonialities and Modernities. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
ICI Berlin. 2014. “Rosi Braidotti: Thinking as a Nomadic Subject” Video, 47:39. Oct 7, 19:30. https://www.ici-berlin.org/event/620/
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, George. 2010. “Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment”. Environmental Communication, 4 (1): 70-81.
Nader, Laura. 1996. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, Karl. 1974. La grande trasformazione. Torino: Einaudi.
Prakash, Gyan. 1992. “Science ‘Gone Native’ in Colonial India”. Representations, 40: 153-178.
Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason. Science and Imagination in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raina, Dhruv. 1996. “Reconfiguring the Centre. On the Structure of Scientific Exchanges in Colonial India.” Minerva, 34: 161-176.
Raina, Dhruv. 2004. Domesticating Modern Science. New Delhi: Tulika.
Stiglitz, Joseph. E. 2000. Making Globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2009. La globalizzazione e i suoi oppositori. Torino: Einaudi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Gli autori che pubblicano su Kervan accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
The articles that have appeared on Kervan since 2016 are rated as Class A in the system of National Scientific Qualification (ASN, disciplines 10/N1 and 10/N3).
The journal has been approved for inclusion in DOAJ. The DOAJ listing of the journal is available at
The journal has been approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS. The ERIH PLUS listing of the journal is available at
Kervan was just accepted for indexing in SCOPUS. This important milestone ensures that articles published in Kervan are easily found when searching for library, archives and Information science and it enables Kervan authors to keep track of how often their article has been cited by others.