Processes of Dis–location and Re–location of Knowledge and Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/1394Keywords:
dislocation, knowledge, power,Abstract
Historical analysis of domination patterns identifies phases of ongoing dialectics between rich and poor world areas, claiming instances of self-determination and empowerment in international programs of cooperation. At the same time, new major imbalances in relations of power emerge between new global players, who appear to be committed in a competition towards the Western model of development, mainly characterized by the control over technologies and knowledge/. /Such practices of emulation provide examples of complicity with the hegemonic rhetoric, and help strengthen pairs of opposites (emerging/advanced, technological/intuitive, hegemonic/subaltern) increasingly polarized and less dialectical.
Downloads
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. Modernità in polvere. Roma: Meltemi.
Arnold, David. 2000. Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borghi, Liana and Clotide Barbarulli, eds. 2004. Figure della Complessità. Genere e intercultura. Cagliari: Cuec.
Bougleux, Elena. 2012a. Soggetti egemoni e saperi subalterni. Firenze: Nardini.
Bougleux, Elena. 2012b. “Exploring Knowledge Flows in a Multinational Corporation.” World Futures, 68:188-196.
Bougleux, Elena. 2014. “Corporations, tecnoscienze e sviluppo locale: dialogo o Conflitto”. DADA Rivista di Antropologia post-globale, 1, 06/2014: 91-118.
Bougleux, Elena. 2015. “Economy, Knowledge, Families: Practices of Appropriation”. Human Affairs, 25, 1/2015: 3-15.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Le strutture sociali dell’economia. Trieste: Asterios.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Nuovi soggetti nomadi. Transizioni e identità postnazionaliste. Bologna: Sossella.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
Cartwright, Nancy. 2003. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2004. Provincializzare l’Europa. Roma: Meltemi.
Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. “A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies”. Qualitative Research Methods, v. 43, London: Sage.
Das, Veena. 2000. Critical events: an Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Michael J. 2007. “Four Genealogies for a Recombinant Anthropology of Science and Technology”. Cultural Anthropology, 22: 539-615.
Fischer, Michael J. 2009. Anthropological Futures, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1967. Le parole e le cose: un’archeologia delle scienze umane. Milano: Rizzoli.
Foucault, Michel. 1980, L’archeologia del sapere, Milano: Rizzoli.
Guha, Ranajit. 1998. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson, 1997, Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology, Durham: Duke University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from Below. Postcolonialities and Modernities. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
ICI Berlin. 2014. “Rosi Braidotti: Thinking as a Nomadic Subject” Video, 47:39. Oct 7, 19:30. https://www.ici-berlin.org/event/620/
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, George. 2010. “Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment”. Environmental Communication, 4 (1): 70-81.
Nader, Laura. 1996. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, Karl. 1974. La grande trasformazione. Torino: Einaudi.
Prakash, Gyan. 1992. “Science ‘Gone Native’ in Colonial India”. Representations, 40: 153-178.
Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason. Science and Imagination in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raina, Dhruv. 1996. “Reconfiguring the Centre. On the Structure of Scientific Exchanges in Colonial India.” Minerva, 34: 161-176.
Raina, Dhruv. 2004. Domesticating Modern Science. New Delhi: Tulika.
Stiglitz, Joseph. E. 2000. Making Globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2009. La globalizzazione e i suoi oppositori. Torino: Einaudi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Gli autori che pubblicano su Kervan accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.