Legal fictions in East Asia: Recovering a forgotten mode of judge-centered jurisprudence
Abstract
In much of Western legal historical scholarship, legal fictions are understood to be devices for maintaining the integrity of text-based legal codes in the face of social change. However, while legal fictions as such were not a topic of scholarly inquiry in East Asia prior to the introduction of the concept from the West, East Asia is nevertheless rich in examples of another kind of legal fiction: jurisprudential legal fictions, or legal fictions effected by judges and rooted in culture (often including religion). The mythical, moral xiezhi beast in ancient China, and judge-centered moral reasoning in pre-modern Japan, point to legal fictions beyond the traditional categories of such in much of Western scholarship, as well as to legal fictions within the West now largely forgotten after the advent of Enlightenment thinking on textual law.
The articles that have appeared on Kervan since 2016 are rated as Class A in the system of National Scientific Qualification (ASN, disciplines 10/N1 and 10/N3).
Indexed by 
The journal has been approved for inclusion in DOAJ. The DOAJ listing of the journal is available at 
The journal has been approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS. The ERIH PLUS listing of the journal is available at 
Kervan was just accepted for indexing in SCOPUS. This important milestone ensures that articles published in Kervan are easily found when searching for library, archives and Information science and it enables Kervan authors to keep track of how often their article has been cited by others.
