Neurophysiology Technologist in neurorehabilitation and scientific research: an observational study of employment on the Italian national territory.
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
Introduction
The professional figure of the Neurophysiology Technologist (TNFP) has always been related to the diagnostic field. However, the number of technologists employed in the scientific research, or in the neurorehabilitation field, is increasing. Indeed, there are various brain stimulation methods used for neurorehabilitation which can be performed by the TNFP (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - rTMS, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation – tDCS). Furthermore, different recording techniques (Magnetoencephalography - MEG, high density Electroencephalogram - hd-EEG, BCI) allow this professional figure to be included in the field of scientific research.
Objective
This study aims to know the current state of employment of Italian TNFP in the neurorehabilitation and scientific research.
Materials and Methods
A questionnaire was distributed via e-mail by the Neurophysiology Technologists Registry (TSRM PSTRP Orders) and by the Italian Association of Neurophysiology Technologists (AITN) throughout the national territory.
Results
49 of the 91 TNFP participants of the study, carry out activities in neurorehabilitation and/or scientific research. The largest number of participants, 19 out of 49 (39%) is employed in public facilities; the most frequent type of contract is permanent employment (32 technologists out of 49). When asked about the training they received, 13 respondents out of 49 reported that their current place of employment did not provide an adequate training, 21 that they had limited training, 10 considered their training as sufficient, 5 answered that they had been adequately prepared during their university bachelor degree course.
Discussion
Most of the TNFP in the study work in public facilities. The data could indicate how the Italian National Health System is investing in neurorehabilitation and how the TNFP figures are increasingly involved in the scientific development. 66% of the TNFPs (32 technologists) are employed with a permanent contract, of these, 17 are working in Scientific Institues of Health Research and Development, affiliated to public or private: the employment of TNFP is becoming so significant as to lead the aforementioned centers to assign permanent contracts, rather than scholarships or project contracts. On the other hand, 69% (34 technologists) of the participants defined themselves as untrained or with limited grounding, respect to a possible future employment in the neurorehabilitation and/or research field.
Conclusion
The need of more training addressed to neurorehabilitation and research could upgrade Neurophysiology technologists’ skills and consequently increase job opportunities.
Downloads
Dettagli dell'articolo
Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
Riferimenti bibliografici
[2] Gazzetta Ufficiale LEGGE 10 agosto 2000, n. 251. Disciplina delle professioni sanitarie infermieristiche, tecniche, della riabilitazione, della prevenzione nonche' della professione ostetrica. 2000.
[3] Bhattacharya, A., Mrudula, K., Sreepada, S., Sathyaprabha, T., Pal, P., Chen, R., & Udupa, K. (2022). An Over-view of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. Canadian Journal of Neurologi-cal Sciences, 49(4), 479-492. doi:10.1017/cjn.2021.158
[4] https://www.tsrm-pstrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Evoluzione-profili-professionali-Documento-di-posizionamento-TSRM-e-PSTRP-finale.pdf (Accessed August 21, 2023).
[5] Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;11(1):1106–1107.
[6] Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin. 2010;40(1):7–17.
[7] Jannati A, Oberman LM, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcra-nial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jan;48(1):191-208.
[8] Cohen SL, Bikson M, Badran BW, George MS. A visual and narrative timeline of US FDA miletones for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) devices, Brain Stimul. 2022; 15 (1): 73-75.
[9] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Systems - Class II Special Controls Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. 2011. Avaiable at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products/repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-rtms-systems-class-ii-special-controls-guidance (last access 13 April 2023).
[10] FDA permits marketing of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. 2018. Avaiable at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-obsessive-compulsive-disorder (last access 13 April 2023).
[11] Somaa FA, de Graaf TA, Sack AT Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases. .Front Neurol. 2022;13:793253.
[12] Pateraki G, Anargyros K, Aloizou AM, Siokas V, Bakirtzis C, Liampas I, Tsouris Z, Ziogka P, Sgantzos M, Folia V, Peristeri E, Dardiotis E.J. Therapeutic application of rTMS in neurodegenerative and movement disorders: A re-view. Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Feb;62:102622.
[13] Marder KG, Barbour T, Ferber S, Idowu O, Itzkoff A Psychiatric Applications of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2022 Jan;20(1):8-18.
[14] Calabrò RS, Billeri L, Manuli A, Iacono A, Naro A.J. Applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: evidence from a scoping review. Integr Neurosci. 2022 Jun 7;21(4):110.
[15] Paulus W Outlasting excitability shifts induced by direct current stimulation of the human brain. Suppl Clin Neuro-physiol. 2004;57:708-14.
[16] Nitsche MA, Fricke K, Henschke U, Schlitterlau A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Henning S, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmaco-logical modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced byb transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. .J Physiol. 2003 Nov 15;553(Pt 1):293-301.
[17] Fried PJ, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Bartres-Faz D, Bestmann S, Carpenter LL, Celnik P, Edwards D, Farzan F, Fec-teau S, George MS, He B, Kim YH, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Loo C, Luber B, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Sack AT, Thut G, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Pascual-Leone A. Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Mar;132(3):819-837. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
[18] Rich TL, Gillick BT. Electrode Placement in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation- How Reliable Is the Deter-mination of C3/C4? Brain Sci. 2019 Mar 22;9(3):69. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9030069.
[19] Lantz G, Grave de Peralta R, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel C.M, Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?, Clinical Neurophysiology, Volume 114, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 63-69, ISSN 1388-2457
[20] Holmes MD, Brown M, Tucker DM, Saneto RP, Miller KJ, Wig GS, et al. Localization of extra temporal seizure with non-invasive dense-array EEC. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2008;44:474–9.
[21] Yamazaki M, Tucker DM, Terrill M, Fujimoto A, Yamamoto T. Dense array EEG source estimation in neocortical epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2013;4:42.http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00042. eCollection 2013 Erratum in: Front Neurol 2013, 4, 132.
[22] Storti FS, Galazzo IB, Del Felice A, Pizzini FB, Arcaro C, Farmaggio E, et al. Combining ESI, ASL, and PET for quantitative assessment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Neuroimage. 2013Epub ahead of print.
[23] Mégevand P, Spinelli L, Genetti M, Brodbeck V, Momkian S, Schaller K, et al. Electrical source imaging of inter-ictal activity accurately localizes the seizure onset zone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:38–43.
[24] Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, Peralta R. EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 a;115:2195–222.
[25] Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Pollo C, Schaller K, Vargas MI, et al. Electrical source imaging for presurgi-cal focus localization in epilepsy patients with normal MRI. Epilepsia. 2010;51:583–91.
[26] Zumsteg D, Friedman A, Wennberg RA, Wieser HG. Source localization of mesial temporal interictal epileptiform discharges: correlation with intracranial foramen ovale electrode recordings. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(12):2810–8.
[27] Lantz G, Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino S, Michel CM. Noninvasive localization of electromagnet-ic epileptic activity. II. Demonstration of sublobar accuracy in patients with simultaneous surface and depth re-cordings. Brain Topogr. 2001;14(2):139–47.
[28] Brodbeck V, Lascano AM, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Accuracy of EEC source imaging of epileptic spikes in patients with large brain lesions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(4):679–85.
[29] Buril J, Burilova P, Pokorna A, Balaz M, Use of High-Density EEH in patients with Parkinson disease treated with deep brain stimulation, Biomedical Papers, 2020, 164(4):366-370| DOI:10.5507/bp.2020.042.
[30] Seeber M, Scherer R, Wagner J, Solis-Escalante T, Müller-Putz GR. High and low gamma EEG oscillations in cen-tral sensorimotor areas are conversely modulated during the human gait cycle. Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.045. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
[31] Pisarenco I, Caporro M, Prosperetti C, Manconi M, High-density electroencephalography as an innovative tool to explore sleep physiology and sleep related disorders, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Volume 92, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 8-15, ISSN 0167-8760, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.002.
[32] Mason KM, Ebersole SM, Fujiwara H, Lowe JP, Bowyer SM. What you need to know to become a MEG technologist. Neurodiagn J. 2013 Sep;53(3):191-206. doi: 10.1080/21646821.2013.11079906.
[33] Bagić AI, Barkley GL, Rose DF, Ebersole JS; ACMEGS Clinical Practice Guideline Committee. American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society Clinical Practice Guideline 4: qualifications of MEG-EEG personnel. J Clin Neu-rophysiol. 2011 Aug;28(4):364-5. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181cde4dc.
[34] Hegazy M, Gavvala J. Magnetoencephalography in clinical practice. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 May;80(5):523-529. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0083.