Usi storiografici di uno schema retorico: la disputatio in utramque partem
Abstract
The idea that effective oratorical and reasoning skills were best developed when agonistically practiced was deep-rooted in the Roman world, where the dialectic ability of arguing both sides of a case (in utramque partem disserere) represented an essential aim of the elite’s educational curriculum. Interestingly, this technique was fruitfully employed by ancient historians as well, who often reproduced political debates resorting precisely to pairs of contrasting speeches. Accordingly, this essay will deal with the use of so-called disputatio in utramque partem in Latin historiography: by examining its occurrences in Sallust, Livy and Tacitus, this paper will argue that the device served much more than literary purposes, bearing substantial implications also from an epistemological, ethical and pedagogical perspective.
The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
a) The authors retain the rights to their work and assign the right of first publication of the work to the magazine, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating intellectual authorship and the first publication in this magazine.
b) Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that the first publication has taken place in this magazine.
The journal has been approved for inclusion in DOAJ. The DOAJ listing of the journal is available at 
