About the Journal

Focus and Scope

The "Rivista di Storia dell'Università di Torino" has been founded in 2012 with the aim to publish high quality, original research works, by scholars of different fields of specialization, based on well established, as on emerging lines of interdisciplinary historical research on Turin University from its foundation in 1404 to 20th century, on its professors, assistants, students,  ...; on their relationships with national and international colleagues and Institutions; on the role played in research, teaching, education and cultural training.

Peer Review Process

The RSUT will feature in its main sections substantive articles, shorter research notes, and surveys. All contributions will be blind-refereed. Being the RSUT an interdisciplinary journal, all submissions will be refereed by two or more peers with different competence.

Open Access Policy

RSUT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

With the licence CC BY-NC-ND, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download and distribute and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.

It is not necessary to ask further permissions both to author or journal board.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Periodicity

The «Rivista di Storia dell’Università di Torino» (RSUT) appears biannually, around the solstices.

Code of Ethics

The «Rivista di Storia dell’Università di Torino» (RSUT) is committed to  the highest publication standards. The prevention of publication malpractice is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. The Code describes RSUT’s policies for ensuring the ethical treatment of all participants in the peer review and publication process. RSUT Editors, Guest Editors, Reviewers and Authors are encouraged to study these guidelines and address any questions or concerns to the RSUT Chief Editor, Clara Silvia Roero (clarasilvia.roero@unito.it ).

These guidelines apply to all manuscripts submitted to RSUT, and may be revised at any time by the Editor-in-Chief and the Board. The following duties outlined for editors, authors, and reviewers are based on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (latest version, 2011).

Duties of Editor in Chief (Editor) and Guest Editor(s)

Editor/Guest Editor(s) are responsible for the content of the journal and for ensuring the integrity of all work that is published in it.

  • Publication Decisions: The Editor/Guest Editor(s) have the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
  • Review of Manuscripts: RSUT follows a double-blind review process, whereby Authors do not know Reviewers and vice versa. The Editor/Guest Editor(s) are responsible for  securing timely, independent and anonymous peer review from suitably qualified reviewers who have no disqualifying competing interests, of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. The Editor/Guest Editor(s) are responsible for ensuring that the journal has access to an adequate number of competent reviewers. Reviewers will be acknowledged by the journal at the end of each year. Reviewers’ list is public, on the journal website.
  • Fair Review: The Editor/Guest Editor(s) and their editorial staff must ensure that each manuscript received by RSUT is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors.
  • Confidentiality of submitted material: The Editor/Guest Editor(s) and the editorial staff will ensure that systems are in place to ensure the confidentiality and protection from misuse of material submitted to the journal while under review and the protection of authors’ and reviewers’ identities and will themselves take all reasonable steps to preserve the confidentiality of authors’ and reviewers’ identities.
  • Disclosure: The Editor/Guest Editor(s) should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, as appropriate.
  • Conflicts of Interest: The Editor/Guest Editor(s) should excuse themselves from considering a manuscript in which they have a real or potential conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, financial or other relationships or connections with any of the Authors, companies or institutions connected to the manuscript.
  • Authority: The Editor in Chief must have ultimate authority and responsibility for the Journal. The Editor-in-Chief should respect the Journal’s constituents (Readers, Authors, Reviewers, Guest Editors, Editorial Staff), and work to ensure the honesty and integrity of the Journal’s contents and continuous improvement in journal quality.

Duties of reviewers

  • Fair reviews: Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts objectively, fairly and professionally. Reviewers should avoid personal biases in their comments and judgments and they should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Reviewers must provide substantiated and fair reviews. These must avoid personal attack, and not include any material that is defamatory, inaccurate, libellous, misleading, obscene, scandalous, unlawful, or otherwise objectionable, or that infringes any other person’s copyright, right of privacy, or other rights.
  • Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged  information.  Reviewers should  not discuss the manuscript with anyone other than the RSUT Editor/Guest Editor(s), nor should they discuss any information from the manuscript without permission.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Manuscript reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Any kind of similarity or overlap between the manuscripts under consideration or with any other published paper of which reviewer has personal knowledge must be immediately brought to the Editor/Guest Editor(s)’s notice.
  • Timeliness: In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the Editor/Guest Editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.
  • Right of refusal: Reviewers should refuse to review manuscripts: a) where they have provided written comments on the manuscript or an earlier version to the Author, b) in which they have any conflicts of interest resulting from collaborative, financial, institutional, personal, or other relationships or connections with any of the companies, institutions, or people connected to the papers.
  • Complain: Any complaint relating to the journal should, in the first instance be directed towards the Editor-in-Chief of RSUT.

Duties of Authors

  • Originality: Authors must ensure that no part of their work is copied from any other work, either authored by themselves or others and that the work is original and has not previously been published in whole or substantial part. The author should not submit concurrent manuscripts (or manuscripts essentially describing the same subject matter) to  multiple journals.
  • Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. The author should ensure that all co-authors have affirmed the final version of the paper and have agreed on its final publication.
  • Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism: All work in the manuscript should be free of any plagiarism, falsification, fabrications, or omission of significant material. Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism constitute unethical publishing behaviour and are unacceptable. RSUT reserves the right to evaluate issues of plagiarism and redundancy on a case-by-case basis.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources and Conflict(s) of interests: The author should indicate explicitly all sources that have supported the research and also declare any conflict(s) of interest.
  • Data Access and Retention: The author should provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review and must retain such data.
  • Timeliness: Authors should be prompt with their manuscript revisions. If an Author cannot meet the deadline given, the Author should contact the RSUT Managing Editor as soon as possible to determine whether a longer time period or withdrawal from the review process should be chosen.
  • Fundamental Errors in Published Works: The author should promptly inform the Editor/Guest Editor(s) of any obvious error(s) in his or her published paper and cooperate earnestly with the Editor-in-Chief in retraction or correction of the paper. If the Editor-in-Chief is notified by any party other than the author that the published paper contains an obvious error, the author should write a retraction or make the correction based on the medium of publication.

The RSUT Code of Ethics was developed by the Editor-in-Chief and the Board of RSUT.

The Code draws heavily from the following on-line source, which is recommended reading on ethical guidelines:

List of reviewers of RSUT from 2012 to 2016

  • Allio Renata (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Alloatti Giuseppe (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Balani Donatella (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Bargoni Alessandro (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Bianchini Paolo (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Boccuzzi Giuseppe (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Cancian Patrizia (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Carpanetto Dino (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Casana Paola (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Cassata Francesco (Università degli Studi, Genova)
  • Chiosso Giorgio (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • De Fort Ester (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Fiocca Alessandra (Università degli Studi, Ferrara)
  • Giacardi Livia (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Giacobini Giacomo (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Leone Matteo (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Lolli Gabriele (Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa)
  • Losano Giovanni (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Lovisolo Davide (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Luciano Erika (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Marchionatti Roberto (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Minazzi Fabio ((Università degli Studi dell’Insubria)
  • Moretti Mauro (Università per stranieri, Siena)
  • Naso Irma (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Omodeo Pietro Daniel (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin)
  • Pasini Enrico (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Pecchio Oriana (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Rosboch Michele (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Signori Elisa (Università degli Studi, Pavia)
  • Tuccari Francesco (Università degli Studi, Torino)
  • Tucci Pasquale (Università degli Studi, Milano)

Article Processing Charges (APC) e submission charges

RSUT does not require authors Article Processing Charges (APC) or submission charges.

Journal History

The «Rivista di Storia dell’Università di Torino (RSUT)» collected the inheritance of the «Quaderni di Storia dell’Università di Torino» published from 1996 to 2011 in 10 volumes.