Broken stelae, fallen stones. Neglect, deterioration, and disruption of the epigraphic landscape

Resumen

Over the centuries, the cities of ancient Greece produced numerous texts on stone and
metal, and nowhere more so than in ancient Athens. However, when an inscription outlived
its purpose, the problem of reuse arose. Dedications to the gods in stone and bronze,
as sacred objects, presented difficulties in terms of removal. The result was a landscape of
broken stelae and damaged inscriptions alongside new texts. The rules against damaging
inscriptions in the Archaic and Classical periods partly explain this situation. However,
two specific epigraphic documents shed light on this coexistence: an inventory from the
Athenian Acropolis and an inscription from Larisa. By analysing these texts, the article
explores their methodological implications for the reconstruction of the inscribed landscape.
By comparing the situations that led to their publication, the article examines
whether the interest in documenting sacred sites was the sole motivation and whether restoration
initiatives followed. The considerations presented may improve our understanding
of the development of the epigraphic landscape in general and the Athenian landscape
in particular. Indeed, the neglect of older inscriptions is presented here as a significant
factor in the formation of the epigraphic landscape, challenging the prevailing view that it
was solely the result of deliberate decisions by the polis.