SanTO robot: the new with a look at the past

Keywords: social robotics, theomorphic robots, religion, Catholicism

Abstract

In the 1560s Philip II of Spain commissioned the realisation of a "mechanical monk", a small humanoid automaton with the ability to move and walk. Centuries later, a Catholic humanoid robot has been made. With the appearance of a statue of a saint and some interactive features, it is designed for Christian Catholic users for a variety of purposes. The robot features a dialogue system, which integrated within the multimodal communication consisting of vision, touch, voice and lights, drives the interaction with the users. The creation of SanTO offers new insights on the concept of sacredness applied to a robot and the role of automation in religion. While religion can be used as a mean to make robots more familiar to the users, on the other hand this union brings new ethical issues, and needs answers and regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gabriele Trovato, University of Waseda

Gabriele Trovato is currently Assistant Professor in Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. He received his M.S. degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Pisa, Italy, and Ph.D. degree in Biorobotics in Waseda University. He has been Visiting Researcher in PUCP (Peru) and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Germany), among others. Gabriele Trovato’s main research interests include Human-Robot Interaction, and robot cognition and aesthetics.

References

K. O. Arras, D. Cerqui, Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey, in “Technical Report Nr. 0605-001”, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), 2005.

Asimov, I, Robot, New York, Gnome Press, 1951.

Atmel, One-channel Toggle-mode QTouch® Touch Sensor IC with Power Management Functions, AT42QT1012 datasheet, 2013.

G. Bell, No More SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-spiritual Practices, in UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, 2006, pp. 141–158.

Besancon, The Forbidden Image: An Intellectual History of Iconoclasm, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2000.

R. Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains, Princeton University Press, 2004.

S. Dianich, Chiesa in missione. Per un’ecclesiologia dinamica, San Paolo Edizioni, 1987.

E. L., Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, 2012

European Commission, Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382, 2012, disponibile su: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf

Foerst, Cog, a Humanoid Robot, and the Question of the Image of God, in “Zygon®”, 1998, vol. 33, n. 1, pp. 91–111.

Foerst, God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us About Humanity and God, Plume, 2005.

Gell, The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology, in “Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics”, a cura di J. Coote, Ed. Clarendon Press, 1994.

R. M. Geraci, Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world, in “Theology and Science”, 2006, vol. 4, n. 3: 229–246.

R. M. Geraci, Robots and the Sacred in Science and Science Fiction: Theological Implications of Artificial Intelligence, in “Zygon®”, 2007, vol. 42, n. 4, pp. 961–980.

E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior, AldineTransaction, 1967.

Gulliford, Sacred Objects and Sacred Places: Preserving Tribal Traditions, University Press of Colorado, 2000.

R. S. Higgins, Of Gods and Monsters: Supernatural Beings in the Uncanny Valley, in Annual Meeting of the European Association for Biblical Studies, Leipzig, 2013.

P. Hill, K. I. Pargament, Advances in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religion and Spirituality: Implications for Physical and Mental Health Research, in “The American Psychologist”, 2003, vol. 58, n.1, pp. 64-74.

IEEE Standards Association, Ethically Aligned Design, Version 2 (EADv2), 2018, disponibile su: https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/

F. Kaplan, Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots, in “International Journal of Humanoid Robotics”, 2004, vol. 01, n. 03, pp. 465–480.

T. Kimura, Robotics and AI in the sociology of religion: A human in imago roboticae, in “Social Compass”, 2017, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 6–22.

E. King, Clockwork Prayer: A Sixteenth-Century Mechanical Monk, in “Blackbird”, 2002, vol. 1, n. 1.

L. Lindstrom, Cargo Cult: Strange Stories of Desire from Melanesia and Beyond, Honolulu, Univ of Hawaii Pr, 1993.

D. Löffler, J. Hurtienne, I. Nord, Blessing Robot BlessU2: A Discursive Design Study to Understand the Implications of Social Robots in Religious Contexts, in “International Journal of Social Robotics”, 2019

J. McIntyre, Romantic Transcendence and the Robot in Heinrich Von Kleist and E.T.A. Hoffmann, in “The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory”, 1979, vol. 54, n. 1, pp. 29–34.

M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, N. Kageki, The Uncanny Valley [From the Field], in “IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine”, 2012, vol. 19, n. 2, pp. 98–100.

M. J. Muller, E. Christiansen, B. Nardi, S. Dray, Spiritual Life and Information Technology, in “Commun. ACM”, 2001, vol. 44, n. 3, pp. 82–83.

S. O. Okpaku, Clinical Methods in Transcultural Psychiatry, “American Psychiatric Pub”, a cura di S. O. Okpaku, 1998.

J. Riskin, The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument Over What Makes Living Things Tick, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2016.

J. Riskin, Machines in the Garden, in “Nature Engaged”, a cura di M. Biagioli e J. Riskin, Ed. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2012, pp. 229–248

Russell, Robots: The 500-Year Quest to Make Machines Human, Scala Arts & Heritage Publishers Ltd, 2017.

K. Soós, J. Rácz, Eine Automatenfigur in Budapest, in “Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung”, 1990, vol. 1990, n. 4, pp. 207–214

Smith, Older Adults and Technology Use, in “Pew Res. Center: Internet, Science & Tech”, 2014, disponibile su: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/

G. Trovato et al., Towards culture-specific robot customisation: a study on greeting interaction with Egyptians, in The 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2013), Gueongju, 2013.

G. Trovato et al., Introducing ‘theomorphic robots, in 2016 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Cancún, 2016.

G. Trovato et al., Religion and Robots: Towards the Synthesis of Two Extremes, in “International Journal of Social Robotics”, 2019, pp. 1–18.

G. Trovato et al., The creation of DarumaTO: a social companion robot for Buddhist/Shinto elderlies, in 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2019, pp. 606–611.

G. Trovato et al., Design Strategies for Representing the Divine in Robots, in HRI ’18 Companion, Chicago, 2018.

G. Trovato et al., The creation of SanTO: a robot with ‘divine’ features, in 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), 2018, pp. 437–442

G. Trovato et al., Communicating with SanTO – the first Catholic robot, in 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New Delhi, 2019.

Vidal, Anthropomorphism or Sub-Anthropomorphism? An Anthropological Approach to Gods and Robots, in “Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute”, 2007, vol. 13, pp. 917–933.

A. Yerxa, Religion and Innovation: Antagonists or Partners? Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

Published
2020-10-30
How to Cite
Trovato, G. (2020). SanTO robot: the new with a look at the past. Filosofia, (65), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/5077