Il robot SanTO: il nuovo con uno sguardo al passato
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/5077Parole chiave:
robotica sociale, robot teomorfici, CattolicesimoAbstract
Verso il 1560, Filippo II di Spagna commissionò la realizzazione di un “monaco meccanico”, un piccolo automa umanoide che aveva l’abilità di muoversi e camminare. Secoli dopo, è stato creato un robot umanoide cattolico. Con l’apparenza di una statua di un santo e alcune abilità interattive, è fatto su misura per utenti cattolici per vari utilizzi. Il robot contiene un sistema di dialogo, che integrato nella comunicazione multimodale composta da visione, tocco, voce e luci, guida l’interazione con gli utenti. La creazione di SanTO offre nuovi spunti sul concetto di sacralità applicato in un robot, e sul ruolo dell’automazione della religione. Se da un lato la religione può essere usata come strumento per rendere i robot più familiari agli utenti, dall’altro questo connubio presenta nuovi quesiti etici e necessita risposte e regolamentazione.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
K. O. Arras, D. Cerqui, Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey, in “Technical Report Nr. 0605-001”, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), 2005.
Asimov, I, Robot, New York, Gnome Press, 1951.
Atmel, One-channel Toggle-mode QTouch® Touch Sensor IC with Power Management Functions, AT42QT1012 datasheet, 2013.
G. Bell, No More SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-spiritual Practices, in UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, 2006, pp. 141–158.
Besancon, The Forbidden Image: An Intellectual History of Iconoclasm, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2000.
R. Collins, Interaction Ritual Chains, Princeton University Press, 2004.
S. Dianich, Chiesa in missione. Per un’ecclesiologia dinamica, San Paolo Edizioni, 1987.
E. L., Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, 2012
European Commission, Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382, 2012, disponibile su: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
Foerst, Cog, a Humanoid Robot, and the Question of the Image of God, in “Zygon®”, 1998, vol. 33, n. 1, pp. 91–111.
Foerst, God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us About Humanity and God, Plume, 2005.
Gell, The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology, in “Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics”, a cura di J. Coote, Ed. Clarendon Press, 1994.
R. M. Geraci, Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world, in “Theology and Science”, 2006, vol. 4, n. 3: 229–246.
R. M. Geraci, Robots and the Sacred in Science and Science Fiction: Theological Implications of Artificial Intelligence, in “Zygon®”, 2007, vol. 42, n. 4, pp. 961–980.
E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior, AldineTransaction, 1967.
Gulliford, Sacred Objects and Sacred Places: Preserving Tribal Traditions, University Press of Colorado, 2000.
R. S. Higgins, Of Gods and Monsters: Supernatural Beings in the Uncanny Valley, in Annual Meeting of the European Association for Biblical Studies, Leipzig, 2013.
P. Hill, K. I. Pargament, Advances in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religion and Spirituality: Implications for Physical and Mental Health Research, in “The American Psychologist”, 2003, vol. 58, n.1, pp. 64-74.
IEEE Standards Association, Ethically Aligned Design, Version 2 (EADv2), 2018, disponibile su: https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
F. Kaplan, Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots, in “International Journal of Humanoid Robotics”, 2004, vol. 01, n. 03, pp. 465–480.
T. Kimura, Robotics and AI in the sociology of religion: A human in imago roboticae, in “Social Compass”, 2017, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 6–22.
E. King, Clockwork Prayer: A Sixteenth-Century Mechanical Monk, in “Blackbird”, 2002, vol. 1, n. 1.
L. Lindstrom, Cargo Cult: Strange Stories of Desire from Melanesia and Beyond, Honolulu, Univ of Hawaii Pr, 1993.
D. Löffler, J. Hurtienne, I. Nord, Blessing Robot BlessU2: A Discursive Design Study to Understand the Implications of Social Robots in Religious Contexts, in “International Journal of Social Robotics”, 2019
J. McIntyre, Romantic Transcendence and the Robot in Heinrich Von Kleist and E.T.A. Hoffmann, in “The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory”, 1979, vol. 54, n. 1, pp. 29–34.
M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, N. Kageki, The Uncanny Valley [From the Field], in “IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine”, 2012, vol. 19, n. 2, pp. 98–100.
M. J. Muller, E. Christiansen, B. Nardi, S. Dray, Spiritual Life and Information Technology, in “Commun. ACM”, 2001, vol. 44, n. 3, pp. 82–83.
S. O. Okpaku, Clinical Methods in Transcultural Psychiatry, “American Psychiatric Pub”, a cura di S. O. Okpaku, 1998.
J. Riskin, The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument Over What Makes Living Things Tick, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2016.
J. Riskin, Machines in the Garden, in “Nature Engaged”, a cura di M. Biagioli e J. Riskin, Ed. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2012, pp. 229–248
Russell, Robots: The 500-Year Quest to Make Machines Human, Scala Arts & Heritage Publishers Ltd, 2017.
K. Soós, J. Rácz, Eine Automatenfigur in Budapest, in “Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung”, 1990, vol. 1990, n. 4, pp. 207–214
Smith, Older Adults and Technology Use, in “Pew Res. Center: Internet, Science & Tech”, 2014, disponibile su: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/
G. Trovato et al., Towards culture-specific robot customisation: a study on greeting interaction with Egyptians, in The 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2013), Gueongju, 2013.
G. Trovato et al., Introducing ‘theomorphic robots, in 2016 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Cancún, 2016.
G. Trovato et al., Religion and Robots: Towards the Synthesis of Two Extremes, in “International Journal of Social Robotics”, 2019, pp. 1–18.
G. Trovato et al., The creation of DarumaTO: a social companion robot for Buddhist/Shinto elderlies, in 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2019, pp. 606–611.
G. Trovato et al., Design Strategies for Representing the Divine in Robots, in HRI ’18 Companion, Chicago, 2018.
G. Trovato et al., The creation of SanTO: a robot with ‘divine’ features, in 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), 2018, pp. 437–442
G. Trovato et al., Communicating with SanTO – the first Catholic robot, in 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New Delhi, 2019.
Vidal, Anthropomorphism or Sub-Anthropomorphism? An Anthropological Approach to Gods and Robots, in “Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute”, 2007, vol. 13, pp. 917–933.
A. Yerxa, Religion and Innovation: Antagonists or Partners? Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Filosofia applica una licenza Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a tutto il materiale pubblicato.
