WISEs’ Social Impact Measurement in the Baltic States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-9906/5091Keywords:
Social enterprise, WISEs, Social impact measurement, Measurement indicatorsAbstract
WISEs devote most of their time and resources to working with the target group - not only organizing their employment activities and developing skills but also adapting their work environment, improving the psychological climate, organizational culture, etc. Thus, the implementation of the social mission of this type of social enterprise requires a particularly large amount of time and other resources. In addition, they have to take care of the financial sustainability of their organization. However, WISEs as all social enterprises face the pressure from society and other stakeholders to measure their social impact. Nevertheless, it is also important to note that scientists still disagree on the definition of social impact. It is noteworthy that there are no common criteria for measuring social impacts and there are many different methods and tools for impact assessment and measurement (Arena et al. al., 2015; Hadad and Găucă, 2014). Thus, it remains unclear what and how WISEs should measure their social impact. However, it can be argued that social impact measurement it’s very important for the WISE itself. The aim of this article - to identify what and how WISEs should measure their social impact in the organization. The methods of the research are an analysis of scientific literature and experts’ interview. The results of the research disclosed the possible measurement framework and indicators.
References
Amati, T., Arena, M., Bengo, I., & Caloni, D. (2017). Social Impact Measurement and Management: Between Theory and Practice. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Business Models and Managerial Strategies in the Nonprofit Sector (p. 371–388). IGI Global.
Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Bengo, I. (2015). Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26 (2), 649–672.
Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40 (1), 149–165.
Barraket, J., & Yousefpour, N. (2013). Evaluation and social impact measurement amongst small to medium social enterprises: Process, purpose and value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72 (4), 447–458.
Battilana, J., and Dorado, S. (2010), ‘Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations’. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6), 1419–1440.
Bengo, I., Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Calderini, M. (2016). Indicators and metrics for social business: a review of current approaches (vol 7, pg 1, 2016). JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 7 (3), 369–369.
Biancone, P., Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., & Iannaci, D. (2020). Business Model Innovation for Sustainability and Social Impact. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 9(5), 30–40
Charmaz K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7 (1), 99–124.
Cooney, K. (2011). The business of job creation: An examination of the social enterprise approach to workforce development. Journal of Poverty, 15 (1), 88–107.
Crucke, S. and Decramer, A. (2016). ‘The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises’. Sustainability, 8, 161.
Davister, C., Defourny, J., & Grégoire, O. (2004). Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. Revue Internationale de l’Économie Sociale: Recma, 293, 24–50.
Ebrahim, A., and V. K. Rangan. 2014. “What Impact?” California Management Review 56 (3): 118–141.
Ebrahim, A. S., and V. K. Rangan. (2010). Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.
Grieco, C. 2015. Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all?. Springer.
Grieco, C., L. Michelini, and G. Iasevoli. 2015. “Measuring Value Creation in Social Enterprises a Cluster Analysis of Social Impact Assessment Models.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44 (6): 1173–1193.
Grieco, C., & Michelini, L. (2018). 2: Mind the gap! Existing barriers to standardizing the measurement of social value creation. In Measuring and Controlling Sustainability (p. 50–62). Routledge.
Hadad, S., & Gauca, O. D. (2014). Social impact measurement in social entrepreneurial organizations. Management & Marketing, 9 (2), 119.
Hehenberger, L., Harling, A. M., & Scholten, P. (2013). A practical guide to measuring and managing impact. European Venture Philanthropy Association (EVPA). Internet access: http://www.oltreventure.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/05/EVPA_A_Practical_Guide_to_Measuring
_and_-Managing_Impact_final.pdf.
Hornsby, A. (2012). The Good Analyst. Impact Measurement and Analysis in the Social-Purpose Universe. Investing for.
Iannaci, D. (2020). Reporting tools for social enterprises: between impact measurement and stakeholder needs. European Journal of Social Impact and Circular Economy, 1(1b), 1-18.
Jurgelane, A., Lanka, S. (2017). Social Impact Measurement: an Innovative Tool For Fostering the Positive Social Change Created by Social Enterprises. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for all ICLEL 2017 (p. 668–678), Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 12–14 Sept. 2017.
Oborenko, Z., & Rivza, B. (2018). Legal and policy framework of employment for people with disabilities in latvia. In Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings (No. 49).
Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative health research, 19 (11), 1632–1641.
Krutulienė, Pocius, Gruževskis, Okunevičiūtė-Neverauskienė, Junevičius (2017). Mokslinio tyrimo „sunkiai integruojamų į darbo rinką asmenų užimtumo didinimo galimybių tobulinimas“ ataskaita. Internet access: http://www.stopskurdas.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Sunkiaiintegruojamu-i-DR-asmenu-uzimtumo-didinimo galimybiu-tobulinimas.pdf.
Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. In Environmental management accounting and supply chain management (p. 171–202). Springer, Dordrecht.
Meadows, M., & Pike, M. (2010). Performance management for social enterprises. Systemic practice and action research, 23 (2), 127–141
Neverauskienė, L. O., & Moskvina, J. (2011). Socialinės įmonės: socialinės ekonomikos raidos aspektas. Filosofija. Sociologija, 22 (4), 384–393.
Nyssens, M. (2014). European work integration social enterprises. Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective, 211–230.
Noya, A. (2015), "Social Entrepreneurship - Social Impact Measurement for Social Enterprises", OECD Employment Policy Papers, No. 10, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrtpbx7tw37-en
Raisiene, A. G., & Urmanavičienė, A. (2017). Mission drift in a hybrid organization: how can social business combine its dual goals?. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews-Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 30 (2), 301–310.
Raudsaar, M., & Kaseorg, M. (2013). An exploration of social entrepreneurship in Estonia. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2 (2), 19–29.
Syrjä, P., Sjögrén, H., & Ilmarinen, A. (2015, June). Performance measurement in social enterprises–a conceptual accounting approach. In 5th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise-Building a scientific, Helsinki, Finland (Vol. 29).
Spiess-Knafl, W., & Scheck, B. (2017). Impact investing: Instruments, mechanisms and actors. Springer.
Zeyen, A., & Beckmann, M. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics: Understanding the Contribution and Normative Ambivalence of Purpose-driven Venturing. Routledge
Žydžiūnaitė, V., Sabaliauskas, S. (2017). Kokybiniai tyrimai, principai ir metodai. Vilnius: leidykla VAGA.
EJSICE has been approved for inclusion in DOAJ. The DOAJ listing of the journal is available at 
EJSICE is a member of 
EJSICE is indexed by 
EJSICE is listed in the ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes) as a scientific journal in both AREA 13 - Economic and statistical sciences and AREA 14 - Political and social sciences. 
