The Joint Research Centre of the EU Commission: An Ideological Dispositif for Whom? A Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13135/2611-853X/13015

Abstract

This paper comprehensively examines the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) public communication and its practices when interacting with recruited external contributors, shedding light on its role as a Foucauldian dispositif in shaping political narratives and policy decisions. Drawing inspiration from the works of Gilbert and Wodak (2000), Rossetti di Valdalbero (2021), and building upon the insights of Hughes (2018), this study employs a blend of Critical and Positive Discourse Analysis, quantitative and qualitative multimodal corpus linguistics, and autoethnography (Chang 2008; Adams et al. 2015) to dissect the JRC's activities and their implications for decision-making processes within the EU. The paper particularly focuses on the political struggles among actors involved in decision-making processes and the impact on report authors.

Keywords: Joint Research Centre; dispositif; European Union; discourse analysis; multimodality; autoethnography; political communication

Author Biography

Michelangelo Conoscenti, University of Turin

Professor of English Language and Linguistics at the University of Turin. His main research interests include the Analysis of Political and Military Discourse. To investigate these, he developed Critical Reverse Language Engineering, achieved through a blend of Discourse Analysis, Netnography and innovative corpus-based data-mining techniques. “Expert evaluator” for the European Commission, G.D. Education and Culture. Member of the Steering Committee and co-author of the Flagship Report Understanding Our Political Nature presented to the Von der Leyen’s Commission by the Joint Research Centre. From 2014 Scientific Coordinator for NATO’s Working Groups on InfoOps, PsyOps e StratCom (research and coordination of WGs).

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles