Aesthetic Precariousness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2281-6658/797Keywords:
Filosofia, estetica, arteAbstract
Precarization of labor and social precarity are expanding phenomena around the world. They are the result of the neoliberal policies and globalization during the last decades. These economic and social growing conditions intertwine with the growing precariousness of art today, a condition which is deepening in the last decades. “Aesthetic precariousness” is a specific condition of contemporary art and aesthetics in late capitalist culture, although it hast some roots in what Jacques Rancière has called “aesthetic regime of art”. This paper essays to summarize three relevant aspects of aesthetics precariousness: 1) art as a precarious expression of that condition; 2) art as a precarious medium of reflection on that precarious condition; and 3) art-discourses (i.e., contemporary art criticism and philosophy) as precarious ways of discourse.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep the copyrights for their work and give the journal the work’s first publication copyright, which is at the same time licensed under a Creative Commons License – Attribution, which in turn allows other parties to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Content Licence
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Metadata licence
CoSMo published articles metadata are dedicated to the public domain by waiving all publisher's rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.