Disagreements and celebrations in rhetorical style: epistolary etiquette
Abstract
This paper argues that the Epistulae ad Brutum are sophisticated rhetorical artefacts that deserve greater attention than as mere historical documents. In this anthology of letters, Cicero has two objectives: to urge Brutus to act in defence of the res publica and to legitimise Cicero’s refusal to comply with personal requests. The analysis of ad Brut. 1, 12 (SB 21) and 1, 13 (SB 20) reveals the paradox of a rhetoric of refusal over that of consent, based on the alternation of conciliatory and polemical registers and the skilful management of adfectus. In ad Brut. 1, 9 (SB 18), the correspondence takes on the characteristics of an epistolary “contest”: the orator intertwines the public and private spheres, calls Brutus to duty and, as a result, claims glory and persuasive superiority, transforming consolation into reproach. Emerging from this reading is the figure of Cicero capable of manipulating emotions and reaffirming his role.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The journal is included in DOAJ. The DOAJ listing of the journals is available at
The journal has been included in ERIH PLUS. The ERIH PLUS listing of the journals is available at 