Shakespeare and the theatricalization of passions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/6269Parole chiave:
passions, Shakespeare, Wright, Antony and Cleopatra, The Winter's TaleAbstract
Theatre, at a dialogical level, presents encounters and clashes of different perspectives, world-views, styles, languages, ideologies. In Shakespearean theatre the word, from a rhetorical point of view, becomes someone else word to be disputed. The rhetorical aim of this dispute is to attain pathos through ethos. The actor, like a skillful orator, arouses passions in the mind and in the soul of his audience. In Shakespeare’s theatre, passions are a real poetic practice, in particular in the great tragedies and in the romances. The paper will investigate different, and opposite, ways of the theatricalizing passions in Antony and Cleopatra and The Winter’s Tale.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aquinas, Thomas. 1982. “Of the Passions, Which Are Acts Common to Man and Other Animals” in Summa Theologica, Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, edited by Daniel J. Sullivan, vol. I, 720-826. Chicago: William Benton Publishers.
Aristotle. 1995. Rhetoric in The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Augustin. 1952. The City of God, Books VIII-XVI, translated by Gerald G. Walsh and Grace Monahan. Washington: The Catholic University of America.
Batman, Stephan. 1582. Batman Vpon Bartholome. London.
Bright, Timothy. 1586. A Treatise of Melancholy. London.
Burton, Robert. 1621. The Anatomy of Melancholy. London.
Charron, Pierre. 1729. De la sagesse (1601), engl. transl. George Stanhhope, Of Wisdom. London.
Cicero Marcus Tullius. 2002. Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4 in Cicero on the Emotions, translated and with Commentary by Margaret Graver. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Coeffetau, F.N. 1621. A Table of Humane Passions. London.
Davies, Sir John. 1612. Nosce Teipsum. London.
Dekker. Thomas. 1612 If It Be Not Good Play, The Diuel is in it. London.
Elam, Keir. 1992a. “Early Modern syntax and late Shakespearean rhetoric”, in Early Modern English: trends, forms and texts, edited by Carmela Nocera Avila, Nicola Pantaleo and Domenico Pezzini, 61-80. Bari: Schena.
Elam, Keir. 1992b. “Inelocutio. Shakespeare and the rhetoric of passions”, in Shakespeare. Rhetorique du texte et du spectacle, edited by Marie Thérèse Jones-Davies, 143-156. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Escolme, Bridget. 2013. Emotional Excess on the Shakespearean Stage: Passion’s Slaves. London: Bloomsbury.
Graham, Daniel W. (ed.). 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greg, Walter Wilson. 1955. The Shakespeare First Folio, its bibliographical and textual history. Oxford: Clarendon.
Heywood, Thomas. 1612. An Apology for Actors. London.
Holland, Philemon. 1603. The Philosophie, commononlie callled, The Morals. London.
Huarte, Juan. 1594. The Examinations of Mens, trans. Richard Carew. London.
Lemnius. 1581. The Touchstone of Complexions, translated by T. Newton. London.
Luís Martínez, Zenón. 2010. “Macbeth and the Passions’ ‘Proper Stuff’”, in Sederi 20: 71-101.
Long, A.A, Sedley, D.N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosopher. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nemesius. 1636. The Nature of Man, translated by Edmond Grimeston. London.
Nixon, Anthony. 1612. The Dignitie of Man. London.
Partridge, Eric. 1968. Shakespeare’s Bawdy. London: Routledge.
Paster, Gail Kern. 2004. Humoring the Body. Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Paster, Gail Kern, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd Wilson (eds.). 2004. Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Peacham, Henry. 1577. The Garden of Eloquence. London.
Pramaudaye, Pierre de la. 1586. The French Academie, translated by T. Bowes. London.
Reynoldes, Edward. 1640. A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soule of Man. London.
Serpieri, Alessandro. 1986. Retorica e immaginario. Parma: Pratiche.
Shakespeare, William. 2020. Arden Shakespeare Third Series Complete Works, edited by Richard Proudfoot, Ann Thompson, David Scott Kastan and H.R. Woudhuysen. London: The Arden Shakespeare.
Sloan, Thomas O. 1971. “Introduction” in Thomas Wright The Passions of the Minde in Generall, a reprinted based on 1604 edition, xi-xlix. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Sonnino, Lee A. 1968. A Handbook to Sixteenth-Century Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
Von Armin, Hans. 2002. Stoici antichi. Tutti i frammenti. Milano: Bompiani.
Williams, Gordon. 1997. Shakespeare’s Sexual Language. A glossary. London: Continuum.
Wright, Thomas. 1601. The Passions of the Minde in Generall. London.
Wright, Thomas. 1604. The Passions of the Minde in Generall. London.
Wright, Thomas. 1986. The Passions of the Minde in Generall, edited by William Webster Newbold. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Filosofia applica una licenza Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a tutto il materiale pubblicato.
