Logos and its Feignings. Will to Power, Groundlessness and the Decorum Will to Power, Groundlessness and the Decorum of Civilisations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/13153Parole chiave:
Groundlessness, Logos, Civilisation, FeigningsAbstract
The article aims to explore a characteristically twentieth-century paradox: the simultaneous success and failure of logos. While the century witnessed extraordinary achievements in science and technology, it also saw a profound crisis of foundations – a dramatic disintegration of the very supports that had sustained the Western tradition. Not only were traditional anchors such as God and consciousness called into question, but even more fundamental structures – writing, the alphabet, the very notions of rationality and causality – came under critical scrutiny, revealing their limits. This collapse gives rise to two opposing forms of nihilism, which can no longer be disguised or sublimated, as great thinkers and artists of the past had once managed to do. In this context, concepts such as the socalled sensus communis and the decorum of civilizations are reconsidered – not as static monuments of inherited tradition, but as dynamic legacies that must be continually rethought and kept alive through the movement of thought.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Adorno, Theodor Ludwig Wiesengrund. 1973. Negative Dialectics. Tr. by E. B. Ashton. London- New York: Routledge.
Benn, Gottfried. 1968. “Kunst und Drittes Reich” in Essays und Aufsätze, 861-884. Wiesbaden: Limes.
Blumenberg, Hans. 2012. “Money or Life: Metaphors of Georg Simmel’s Philosophy”. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (7-8): 249-262.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1992. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). Edited By W. Bonsipien and H.-C. Lucas. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Heidegger, Martin. 1997. Kant and The Problem of Metaphysics. Tr. by R. Taft. Bloomington-
Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Kant, Immanuel. 1911. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin: Reimer.
—. 1913. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Reimer.
Lacan, Jacques. 1966. “The Insistence of the Letter in the Unconscious”. Yale French Studies
36/37: 112-147.
Malamoud, Charles. 1989. Cuire le monde; rite et pensée dans l’Inde ancienne. Paris: La Découverte.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1973. The Prose of the World. Tr. by J. O’Neill. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Melandri, Enzo. 1968. La linea e il circolo. Bologna: il Mulino.
Musil, Robert. 1981a. “Der mathematische Mensch” in Gesammelte Werke, vol. 8, edited by A. Frisé, 1004-1007. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
—. 1981b. “Das hilflose Europa” in Gesammelte Werke, vol. 8, edited by A. Frisé, 1075-1093.
Hamburg: Rowohlt
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1999a. “Nachlass 1869-1874” in Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 7, edited by G. Colli and M. Montinari. Berlin: De Gruyter.
—. 1999b. “Nachlass 1884-1885” in Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 11, edited by G. Colli and M. Montinari. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rosenzweig, Franz. 2005. The Star of Redemption. Madison: Winsconsin University Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1960. Critique de la raison dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
Vico, Giambattista. 1948. The New Science. Edited by T. G. Bergin and M. H. Fisch. New York:
Cornell University Press.
Walde, Alois. 1910. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1965. Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”. New
York: Harper and Row.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Francesco Valagussa

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Filosofia applica una licenza Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a tutto il materiale pubblicato.
